Imagine receiving Medicare payments only to find each one slightly smaller than expected. That “missing” amount isn’t an error, it’s sequestration in medical billing. This federal mandate reduces Medicare reimbursements by 2%, directly affecting providers’ revenue, operational workflow, and financial planning. Understanding how sequestration works and how to manage it is critical for any healthcare organization relying on Medicare Fee-for-Service claims.
What Is Sequestration in Medical Billing?
Sequestration in medical billing is a mandatory federal reduction applied to Medicare payments. Providers will often see it listed as CO 253 or CARC 253 on Remittance Advice (RA). These codes indicate a sequestration reduction in federal payment and are a signal that a claim has been adjusted due to policy, not due to error or coding issues. This is different from recoupment in medical billing, where payers retroactively take back previously issued payments following audits, overpayments, or documentation reviews.
The reduction stems from the Budget Control Act of 2011, a law designed to reduce the United States federal deficit. The law implemented a process of automatic, across-the-board cuts to federal spending, including Medicare reimbursements.
Although the cut is only 2%, its effect is amplified for providers who submit high volumes of Medicare claims. For some large practices or hospitals, this could mean tens of thousands of dollars less in reimbursements every month, even when all claims are accurate and properly coded.
Key points about sequestration in medical billing:
- It is mandatory — providers cannot appeal it like a standard denial.
- It applies after the claim is processed and after patient deductibles and coinsurance are applied.
- It affects Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims primarily.
Understanding this distinction is crucial for providers to avoid misclassifying sequestration in medical billing as a billing error. Misinterpretation can result in unnecessary auditing, AR delays, and operational inefficiencies.
Which Medicare Claims Are Affected?
Sequestration in medical billing impacts nearly all Medicare Fee-for-Service claims submitted for services on or after April 1, 2013. Common examples include:
- Physician services – office visits, consultations, and specialist services.
- Hospital visits – inpatient and outpatient procedures, diagnostic services, and lab tests.
- Durable medical equipment (DME) – wheelchairs, oxygen equipment, and prosthetic devices.
- Prosthetics and orthotics – artificial limbs, braces, and other support devices.
- Multi-day supply rentals – equipment rented over multiple days, such as hospital beds or mobility aids.
Exceptions are limited but can include certain Medicare Advantage plans, critical access hospitals, or unique emergency care scenarios. However, these exceptions are rare, so the vast majority of Medicare FFS claims will continue to experience a 2% reduction.
Providers need to stay vigilant in tracking these claims, as failing to account for sequestration can lead to inaccuracies in revenue forecasting and cash flow management.
Why Sequestration Happens
Sequestration in medical billing is a policy-driven federal mandate, not a clinical or operational rule. The purpose is simple: to reduce federal spending when legislative budget targets are not met.
The Budget Control Act of 2011 introduced sequestration as a mechanism for automatic, across-the-board reductions to federal spending, including Medicare. The policy ensures that if Congress fails to pass a deficit-reducing budget, federal programs face cuts to balance expenditures.
For healthcare providers, this means that the reduction:
- Is mandatory and applies uniformly across eligible claims.
- Cannot be influenced by coding practices, claim accuracy, or service delivery.
- Represents a predictable but unavoidable adjustment that must be accounted for in financial planning.
Modern legislative changes and temporary suspensions, such as those under the CARES Act during COVID-19, demonstrate that sequestration may fluctuate in timing or enforcement, but its impact on standard Medicare Fee-for-Service claims is ongoing.
Understanding the policy origin of sequestration helps providers contextualize the reduction and avoid misclassifying it as an underpayment or denial.
How Sequestration Is Calculated
The calculation of sequestration in medical billing is straightforward but critical for billing accuracy. The 2% reduction is applied after the payment portion is determined, meaning after patient deductibles and coinsurance are factored in.
Steps to calculate sequestration:
- Determine the Medicare-approved amount for the service.
- Subtract patient deductible and coinsurance to get the payment portion.
- Apply a 2% reduction to this payment portion.
Example 1 – Office Visit
- Medicare-approved amount: $120
- Patient deductible met: $0
- Payment before sequestration (80% of $120): $96
- Sequestration reduction: 2% of $96 = $1.92
- Payment after sequestration: $94.08
Example 2 – DME Claim
- Approved amount: $500
- Patient coinsurance: $50
- Payment portion before sequestration: $450
- Sequestration reduction: 2% of $450 = $9
- Payment after sequestration: $441
Example 3 – Inpatient Procedure
- Medicare-approved amount: $5,000
- Coinsurance/deductible applied: $500
- Payment portion: $4,500
- Sequestration reduction (2% of $4,500): $90
- Final payment: $4,410
These examples illustrate that the 2% cut only affects the payment portion, not patient responsibility. Over time, however, these small reductions can cumulatively create significant revenue loss for providers, making it essential to account for sequestration in monthly financial planning.
Impact of Sequestration
On Providers
The financial impact of sequestration in medical billing is direct. Even a small 2% cut can accumulate over thousands of claims, affecting cash flow and operating margins. Practices may experience:
- Reduced revenue for equipment upgrades, staffing, or expansion
- Increased workload due to extra posting and auditing steps
- Operational stress in balancing AR reporting with accurate patient billing
- Ethical challenges in maintaining care quality while managing financial pressures
On Patients
Patients rarely see sequestration directly, but indirect effects may include:
- Limited access to services if providers adjust capacity to offset revenue loss
- Potential changes in scheduling or availability for Medicare-dependent patients
Sequestration in medical billing does not increase coinsurance or deductibles, but its operational ripple effect can influence patient experience.
On Healthcare Operations
Administrative and operational workflows are impacted because:
- Additional checks are required during payment posting
- AR reporting and forecasting become more complex
- Practices must monitor all eligible Medicare claims to ensure accurate reduction application
How to Lessen the Impact
While sequestration in medical billing cannot be removed, providers can mitigate its operational and financial effects through proactive measures:
- Ensure accurate coding – reducing denials and maximizing the approved payment portion.
- Streamline billing workflows – optimize payment posting, minimize errors, and reduce administrative burden.
- Verify patient insurance – ensure claims are processed without delays or unnecessary adjustments.
- Outsource revenue cycle management – leverage expert teams to maintain consistent and efficient claim processing.
- Include sequestration in financial forecasting – account for the 2% reduction when planning cash flow, staff budgets, and operational expenditures.
By implementing these strategies, practices can maintain operational efficiency, safeguard revenue, and continue providing high-quality patient care without disruptions caused by sequestration.
Conclusion
Sequestration in medical billing is a small, federally mandated reduction, but its cumulative effect on provider revenue, operational workflows, and patient access is substantial. Providers who understand which claims are affected, how reductions are calculated, and the broader operational impact are better equipped to maintain financial stability and operational efficiency.
Proactive management, through accurate coding, optimized workflows, verified patient insurance, and proper financial forecasting, is key to adapting to sequestration without compromising patient care. Staying informed and strategically proactive ensures that practices can weather the 2% reduction while maintaining revenue stability and quality healthcare delivery.
About the Author
